By Giordano Bruno 11/6/2009 - Neithercorp Press

Some people in this world have a knack for quickly discerning a lie. It is an intuitive skill that many Americans have lost. However, even the average person with little insight, given enough time and opportunity, can and will decipher the bigger picture eventually. All propaganda is subject to the test of time, and this fact is no different for the massive H1N1 propaganda effort being thrust upon us by the World Health Organization, elements of the U.S. government, and the media. As events unfold, it has become progressively more obvious that Americans are not taking the bait, and the lies inherent in vaccination campaigns are beginning to unravel.

Nearly Half Of American Families May Refuse Vaccine

Recent polls indicate that many Americans are not concerned about the swine flu, feeling that the media has hyped the threat beyond all reason, while the number of people who plan to refuse the vaccine outright is growing by leaps and bounds:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/19/AR2009081901585.html

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/78266.html

http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/SwineFlu/swine-flu-abc-news-washington-post-poll/story?id=8879819

http://www.newser.com/story/72346/vaccine-scarier-than-swine-flu-poll.html

http://blogs.consumerreports.org/health/2009/09/swine-flu-poll-majority-of-americans-unsure-about-getting-swine-flu-vaccine-preventing-swine-flu.html

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/10/27/20091027flupoll-ON.html

4 out of 10 parents polled said they would not allow their children to be vaccinated. Nearly half of people in numerous polls expressed concerns about the H1N1 shot and may refuse it entirely. Only 30% of those polled said they would “definitely” take the vaccine.This development is astonishing, considering the mainstream media’s non-stop news blitz on the threat of swine flu for the past 6 months. Every conceivable attempt has been made by the MSM to drown out all reason with fear of impending pandemic. Yet, Americans appear strangely unmoved by the media machine. To understand why, one need only look at what the talking-head pundits are now constantly and openly up in arms about: the growing influence of the Liberty Movement.

Attacks On The Liberty Movement

Recent complaints from media shills and globalist organizations like the CFR have only pushed the Liberty Movement further into the spotlight as the frustration over their failed propaganda has become visible. The movement’s anti-disinformation campaigns have been incredibly successful in the past two years, sending Globalist front-men and women into nervous bouts of hand wringing and poorly thought out verbal diatribes. Some of the more notable moments include NBC puppet Dr. Nancy Snyderman’s shrill demand that we all “trust our government officials and just take the damn vaccine!”

Interestingly, Snyderman has also been a major proponent of another potentially dangerous if not fatal vaccine –Gardasil– while labeling it as “safe and effective:”

(See Video Here)

Gardasil is in fact not safe, and its effectiveness is under question. The CDC has identified and admitted to deaths directly caused by the vaccine, as well as numerous illnesses and side-effects:

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/HPV/gardasil.html

Another fascinating note: the CDC has identified Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), a very rare disease, as a possible side effect of Gardasil. GBS was also reported as a side effect of a vaccine administered during the swine flu hysteria of 1976:

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/apr/27/science/sci-swine-history27

The point being that the safety of ALL vaccinations should come under question regardless of their intended purpose.A second and even more striking admission by globalist proponents was a recent Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) symposium on “Global Health.” The participants of the guest panel openly joked about the possible tactic of creating artificial scarcity of H1N1 vaccines, using a form of reverse psychology to frighten us serfs into demanding a shot instead of refusing it:

They also support recent attempts by the states of New York and Massachusetts to force mandatory vaccinations on health care workers, which is a major violation of those workers Constitutional rights:

“QUESTIONER: Good morning. Rory Lanceman. I’m a member of the New York State Assembly. We had a 12-hour hearing on H1N1 earlier this week and much of it focused on the mandatory vaccination that the New York state Department of Health has ordered of almost all health care workers in New York state and I was wondering if you could offer an opinion on whether you think such a policy is effective and sound.

MONTO: I have a very strong opinion about it. (Laughter.) And that is I think that’s appropriate and I think it ties into a dilemma we’re currently having about personal protective equipment and the way health care workers can be prevented from getting H1N1 influenza from their patients and also, the more likely event, transmitting H1N1 infections to their patients because, really, I think the debate about personal protective equipment — availability of N95 masks — is a fascinating discussion based on very little scientific evidence so that what you have is sort of inflated in terms of its value.

But the point I keep making is that you’re more likely — a health-care worker is more likely to get influenza from his or her children than from a patient in terms of protection of the health care worker, but even more importantly, because of this, is more likely to be able to transmit to another sick patient than anything else. And this is really what we’re getting at, not so much protecting the health-care worker but protecting the patient indirectly because often these are immunodeficient patients and the rest who wouldn’t benefit that much from vaccination.

COHEN: And I suppose you wouldn’t even be having the debate if health care workers were first in line to get the vaccine, but that’s part of the issue, right, is that —

MONTO: Well, they are first in line to get the —

COHEN: Well, they’re given priority but do they –

MONTO: They’re given priority but whether they’re going to do it is another issue.

COHEN: Right.

PALESE: That recommendation, really, I think, makes a lot of sense based on scientific evidence.

COHEN: Then should we mandate for children?

(Laughter.)

COHEN: We do for school entry. Individual states do for school entry. Why don’t we do that to protect the population? And we know that protecting our children from the vaccine, if they are indeed ten times more infectious —

Discussion Continues…

COHEN: Well, it’s an interesting question, though. Would you be against mandating?

SIMONSEN: Well, I think this is very interesting because, I mean, especially for the health-care worker example. I mean, there are many, many good reasons why health care workers should be considering immunization for their own safety but also to protect and, first, do no harm to the patients that they are treating. Having said that, does it work to mandate?

I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that’s in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that — there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.”

A questioner, Tom Wilson (the British hobgoblin in the video above), also attacks what he refers to as the “anti-vaccine movement” (only one aspect of a larger organization: the Liberty Movement):

QUESTIONER: Tom Wilson (ph), Cornell Medical School.

Sir, I think we’re all aware that the anti-vaccine movement is having a field day on the Internet and on media outlooks like Fox News and so on, causing productions in vaccine uptake, and it appears to be a pretty unholy alliance of the ultra right and the ultra left working together to sort of hit with strong anti-tactics, and I’m not sure we’re countering these people very well, and one of the things I do in my spare time is counter the AIDS denial as to people believe HIV is harmless or doesn’t exist, and who led to the deaths of over 350,000 people in South Africa over the past decade.

And you have to take these people on in a different style than scientists are used to. We have to develop better sound bites. We have to develop better discussion. You don’t really — you can’t really debate these people, but you have to develop the counter methods. For example, you hear that we shouldn’t take flu vaccines because the mercury will kill us.

Well, Paul Offert (ph) in the New York Times last week pointed out that there is less mercury in a flu shot than there is in a tuna fish sandwich, and that’s a powerful sound bite to use against the crazy people who think that vaccines will kill you. That’s just one example. We need to develop anti-tactics to get across the message that vaccines are safe and beneficial to society, and we need to learn to deal with the crazy people who would try and stop us doing that.

If this is not a planted question then it certainly contains all the elements of one. The panel goes on to generally agree with Wilson, who uses the old tactic of not only comparing us to Nazis but also Communists (interesting coming from a CFR participant, since the CFR is openly socialist and supports the formation of centralized world government, not to mention the CFR was founded by the Rockefeller Family, who helped fund the Nazi apparatus through their company, Standard Oil, as proven by IG Farben’s “Von Knieriem Document”). Finally, let us not forget:

“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England … (and) … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.”-Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton, quote from “Tragedy and Hope,” 1966

Wilson then uses another old tactic of subtly connecting the Liberty Movement with “AIDS deniers,” an obviously ridiculous fringe movement. Different versions of this tactic are used by globalists regularly, especially the attempt to link the Liberty Movement with “holocaust deniers.”

He calls us crazy at least twice then uses what he refers to as a “sound bite:”“There is less mercury in a flu shot then there is in a tuna fish sandwich…”He seems very proud of this sound bite / talking point, but all he has really done is expose what is sometimes referred to as “the idiocy of intellectuals” inherent in an organization like the CFR. That is to say, Wilson’s use of this seemingly poignant factoid has actually revealed his ignorance of the wider view, because the factoid is really a form of half truth. Let’s quickly examine it.

While it is true that fish and many other elements of the food chain contain traces of mercury, Wilson appears to suggest that this is a natural occurrence. However, most mercury contamination in the food chain comes from industrial pollution of the atmosphere, and is anything but natural:

http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/environment/mercury/index.html

He also uses a twisted form of logic in his suggestion that since our food is already contaminated with mercury, it should not bother us that our vaccinations are as well. As funny as it may sound to some, the EPA actually warns against too much tuna in ones diet, especially for children, due to the adverse effects of heavy metals, so the “revelation” that tuna is contaminated with mercury does not necessarily comfort me when considering taking a vaccine:

http://www.nrdc.org/health/effects/mercury/tuna.asp

But the real weakness in Wilson’s argument (as with all arguments supporting vaccination) is that the science does not support it. Before naïve junior members of the CFR begin presenting arguments such as this, they should really do their research.

A tuna fish sandwich can contain slightly more mercury than a flu shot, but what Wilson doesn’t know, or fails to mention, is that animal data indicates that less than 0.01% of ingested mercury (through food) is actually absorbed into the body:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_poisoning

As opposed to a vaccine, which is injected directly into the blood stream and into the human brain, causing immediate absorption! This is possibly even worse than inhaling mercury vapor, which is 80% absorbed into the blood stream through the respiratory tract. Wilson’s comparison is not just erroneous, but downright idiotic.

Here is a short video explaining exactly what Mercury does to brain cells:

So, mercury has been proven to cause neuron damage and loss of higher brain function, giving the general population weak thought process ability (which may be why an organization like the CFR is so keen on injecting us with it).

Any mercury contamination, regardless of its source, should not be tolerated by any society wishing to remain healthy. This includes vaccines.

What The Propagandists Don’t Like To Mention…

Here are a few facts vaccine proponents always seem to “forget:”

1) Normal influenza kills approximately 30,000 people in the U.S. every year. Swine flu has been attributed to only 1000 deaths so far in the U.S., most of these in people who already had other health afflictions. The swine flu has proven to be no more dangerous than any other flu.

2) Thimerosal is in no way a necessary ingredient of vaccines. In fact, the German army and government recently purchased vaccinations for themselves from GlaxoSmithKline, one of the world’s largest vaccine producers, which contain no mercury. The rest of the German populace will be given mercury laced vaccines.

http://www.thelocal.de/national/20091018-22649.html

3) Many people mistakenly believe that the viruses contained in vaccines are harmless, inactive, or dead. In fact, the inhaled version of the swine flu vaccines and some others contain live viruses. The main ingredient in the GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis vaccines contain a LIVE VIRUS, or attenuated virus, meaning it’s a weakened form of the swine flu (H1N1) virus. Live virus vaccines have a much greater potential to cause illness, or unanticipated viral mutations.

4) Dangerous ingredients in the Swine Flu vaccine:http://www.rense.com/general86/dngers.htm

MF59: A squalene-based adjuvant that when combined with a live attenuated virus becomes many times more potent and deadly.

Mercury: Brain dysfunction, numerous other health problems.Formaldehyde: A known carcinogen.Aluminum adjuvant: Causes cognitive dysfunction

Octoxynol 10: (Also known as Triton X-100) A detergent, emulsifier, wetting and defoaming agent. [Octoxynol-9 is a spermatocide.] It can alter metabolic activity, damage membranes, and cause a rapid decline in cell function.

Polysorbate 80: Also known as Tween 80. It is used as an emulsifier in cosmetics, and is one of the ingredients in Gardasil, the cervical cancer vaccine that is being mandated/promoted for teen-age girls. This ingredient is known to cause infertility, grand mal convulsions, spontaneous abortions, and life-threatening anaphylactic shock.

Span85: According to the Pesticide Action Network North America [PANNA], this chemical is used as a pesticide. It is also used as an adjuvant and is “toxic to humans, including carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, and acute toxicity.”

5) Another incident concerning vaccines that propagandists have tried to hide is the quiet discovery of live and very deadly Bird Flu and Spanish Influenza contained in supposedly harmless seasonal H3N2 flu vaccines distributed by Baxter International. This event went almost completely unreported by the U.S. Media:

http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html

Though it is nearly impossible to “accidentally” mix a combination of live Avian Flu and Spanish Flu into a regular seasonal flu vaccination, Baxter somehow did. The deadly shipment of vaccines was only discovered when a subcontractor in the Czech Republic inoculated ferrets with the product, after which they immediately died. Ferrets should not die from exposure to human H3N2 flu viruses. Who knows how many human deaths could have occurred if the vaccine had not been subjected to secondary tests by a subcontractor.

Baxter International was recently awarded a contract to produce swine flu vaccines to be distributed in the U.S., despite the horrifying incident in Europe.

Vaccine Propagandists Regroup

Attempts to force healthcare workers into mandatory vaccinations have utterly failed, and if you can’t even force doctors and nurses to take your vaccine, then convincing the rest of the population to do so voluntarily will be nearly impossible. Even scientists who helped create the vaccine have refused to take it themselves:

Propagandists have resorted to the “guilt maneuver,” placing the blame on people who do not get vaccinated for the spread of any virus, especially parents who do not vaccinate their children.

WHO officials and many doctors sometimes refer to the vaccination process as the “herd inoculation ratio.” Their stated goals are to vaccinate a certain percentage of the population or “herd” during any pandemic threat. The higher the ratio, the safer the herd, or so the theory goes. Anti-vaccine activists are often accused of “endangering the herd” by refusing the vaccine and lowering the inoculation ratio. This argument is patently absurd.

Parents who refuse to expose their children to poisonous vaccines are accosted by the media and the government as reckless and willing to endanger the children of others, but if the other children in a school environment are vaccinated, and vaccines actually work, then they should be safe from any swine flu an un-vaccinated child could pass to them. The only threat to anyone would be to the unvaccinated child, if indeed, vaccines were safe and effective. Parents who believe that vaccinations are safe and have their children injected should have no reason whatsoever to concern themselves with parents who do not vaccinate their children.

The lie of “herd safety” is meant to instill a sense of guilt and false collective responsibility. The vaccine becomes a sacrifice for an imaginary “greater good,” when in reality a choice to not take the vaccine only affects the person it was meant for, and not the community as a whole.

Propagandists will continue to pursue this argument as long as people remain unaware of the facts. Ever more pervasive tactics will be used, especially in television media. I now leave you with a series of videos depicting vaccine propaganda and government actions from the 1976 swine flu fake-out, to the imaginary (and engineered) pandemic threats of today:

Posted on Friday, November 6th, 2009 at 5:17 pm in the category:All Posts. Comment RSS 2.0 feed. Comment it , or trackback this post.