But the most impressive thing of all was your responses to people who leave comments here. Not only are they on time, but they are perfectly executed. It must be daunting to say something here as a troll, because you’d get owned into oblivion.

I agree with Einstein’s view in part, but I also have to take into account human nature, which is archetypal and based on duality. Jung said that new ideas are born out of natural oppositions, meaning oppositions are essential to progression. The problem is, elites understand the system of dualities and have learned how to manipulate it. They have stood outside the natural ebb and flow of events because they know how to create unnatural and engineered oppositions.

Until this point, they have never faced a true opposition. This is why the freedom of the first American Revolution was only sustained for about a century. We knew we were fighting elitists, but we didn’t know the whole story.

This time, and for the first time, we know exactly who we are dealing with, how they operate, and why they do what they do. We thus become the opposition that is natural to the flow of history. Meaning, by opposing elitism, we are doing exactly what is required to return balance.

Eventually, all oppositions should be handled internally within ourselves, instead of projected on innocent bystanders. However, elitism represents an anomaly in the system as long as it faces no opposing force. Until it is opposed and removed, society will never have the luxury of internalizing its conflicts, and therefore will never achieve peace.

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

I believe it was Einstein who said that a problem cannot be solved on the level it was created on. In order to solve it, one must elevate to a higher perception. In my opinion, Einstein is really on to something here. And it relates well to this discourse. The ‘us against them’ is on the level that the ‘problem’ has been created on. To join that fight would not lead to a successful solution. America’s liberty was won through this method, yet it was lost in short order as the game continued. I’m amazed that Thomas Jefferson foresaw exactly how the elites would regain control of America, and how the republic would be lost. I’m interested in changing the game, and I think we can look to Einstein and his wisdom to strategize on how we can put an end to this game.

I am assuming that in the chess game being played by the global elites, a key strategy is to have a faction of well informed people stand in opposition to the plan. In fact, in the manifest universe of yin/yang, night/day, hot/cold, up/down, how could it be any different? I acknowledge your position as standing in opposition to the plans of the nwo. I can only try to explain why I choose to remain free from standing in opposition, as well as free from standing in agreement. I do not support the globalist agenda of control, yet I do envision a world community united in its’ diversity.

I believe the story of Jesus stepping out of the boat amidst a raucus storm, and calming the storm before inviting Peter to also step out of the boat is a great metaphor for what was aforementioned quoted by Einstein. While ‘in the boat’ (‘us against them’), the storm rages on and fear/struggle prevails. Stepping out of the boat goes against all logic, it is really taking an alternative perspective……yet the story speaks of success after taking that ‘leap of faith’. This may be a narrow path, it may be unpopular, it may not make any sense, but I feel that it is the only way to successfully and permanently shift the prevailing agendas of the impending world community away from control and into liberty. In my humble opinion, we are each being called to elevate…..to transcend the ‘game’….to step out of the boat……to embody the second coming of Christ individually. Remember the 100th monkey principle….when a critical percentage of a population “gets” something, then the rest of the population catches on nearly instantaneously.

Maybe I’m a dreamer……….

I respect your stance, I respect your work. Thanks for the information and well researched articles.

While I think I understand what you’re trying to say, and I agree to a certain point, there are a few things I see little support for.

The elites are not a result of “birth pains” of a changing world. This suggests that they are an act of nature or are completely unaware of what they do. In fact,the elites, like everyone else, are individuals with the ability to CHOOSE their own destines and actions. They have chosen to commit to a life of destruction, imbalance, and pain. They have chosen to hurt innocent people to their own benefit. Conscience dictates that this is dishonorable and unacceptable. THEY made this an “us versus them” scenario, WE are only reacting to their crimes.

Jesus was a revolutionary. He fought against the system, and he even beat the money changers. If you want to use him as an example, then let’s look at the whole story, instead of just the peace-love-harmony stuff.

No amount of “turning the other cheek” is going to save us. That’s essentially what we’ve been doing for centuries when it comes to the elites. What is the one example of a nation actually becoming free from elites for a generation or more? America after the revolution. They had to fight tooth and nail to be free.

A one world system is simply unnecessary as well. What does world government accomplish? Centralization of power. It is a political model that has nothing to do with enlightenment. Only individuals can pursue self awareness, not governments, therefore, a one world system serves no purpose (unless you want to streamline control of the people).

I suggest you watch the first episode of our film series “Sons Of Darkness, Sons Of Light” here:

http://neithercorp.us/sdsl

As well as read our article “Sheeple: Why They Are The Way They Are”

http://neithercorp.us/npress/?p=182

It is good to be spiritually driven, and its good to want peace, but not at the expense of freedom, or individuality. Without those two things, life is pointless.