I learned about Ron Paul and his common sense solutions. For example in regards to gay marriage – how about we just divorce the issue from government altogether? This libertarian idea isn’t good enough for the conservative and liberal statists who want to force each other’s views on each other. If we took Ron Paul’s approach we wouldn’t be fighting! I can be against gay marriage and for the abolishment of civil marriage anyway – when did God give the state such power anyway? How can the state claim such a sacred thing? And why shouldn’t gays be allowed to marry each other if they want to, even if me and others consider it wrong? It’s their life, and we’re all free to sin and have opinions on what is right or wrong, as long as respect each other’s right to LIFE, LIBERTY, and PROPERTY.

The shocking thing about the Liberty Movement is that we can all get along. People who are socially liberal or socially conservative can work together for the SAME candidates and agree on the same important issues, and leave social issues outside of government where they can be promoted by churches and advocacy groups.

I only voted within the phony 2 party system once in my voting life, and that was for Kerry in 2004. It wasn’t because I thought Kerry had the makings of a really great leader, he was just less bad enough than Bush. I didn’t like voting for him, I have never fully bought into the two party system. That feeling that something is wrong has been there for me from the beginning. After educating myself about the Federal Reserve and the incredible manipulation of wealth and power that exists within the ranks of our government, it has become plainly obvious that Individual liberty is the most important cause in our world today. Thanks for your words.

In my short time as an eligible voter, I have played both sides, and then abandoned them.

Both parties need to be completely discredited. I don’t even like referring to them as 2 parties. I call them the Republicrats or the Globalist Party.